Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Update on PO mess!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="klmno" data-source="post: 506722" data-attributes="member: 3699"><p>thank you, DDD. I think the problem is that PO/super put all their eggs in one basket thinking they had legal authority to instead of continuing to hash out an agreement parole plan for difficult child with me. I know that it wasn't an easy task- for them as well as me, and several things were discussed and many concerns of different types expressed from all of us thru this course. That's not the same thing as refusal- the only thing I refused was 6-8 mos ago when the plan was for difficult child to come home with no services at all, except 30 days house arrest. Obviously, I really can't make them order services though. We did go back and forth over what types of services and that's what PO and I were coming to terms with when super stepped in and refused anything but this post-d. It is their responsibility to transport a kid if a kid is being transferred like this and the central office agreed, the same as if difficult child was transported back to detention center for a court hearing or something. I'm not taking responsibility if he runs or something. The idea for me to transport him was a means to try to get me to sign the agreement for placement. It was only after central office told PO that csu had to transport difficult child that PO came forward with this app/agreement and told me that I had to sign this first if he was transporting difficult child. Otherwise, I wouldn't have known what the program really is, for certain, or that it required my consent unless I showed up with difficult child and demanded to read the entire thing prior to signing something. The fact that I didn't agree to transport difficult child is why this able able to come out prior to difficult child's release so he can't get into trouble over this mess- he hasn't been released on parole today.</p><p></p><p>If PO knew that I wasn't in agreement with post-d so then it would take an order by a judge, he has had mos to get that order, or try to. The super at the Department of Juvenile Justice facility agreed with that yesterday- why did he sit here for months and not have this taken care of? This shows you how much they looked into any of it before digging their heals in. And Why on earth central office hasn't already told him to either go get a court order this week or develop a different parole plan is beyond me. He could have gotton a hearing this week to tell a judge everything you brought out and it might justify a placement out of the home, however, it still wouldn't justify a post-d placement because that would be double jeopardy. And by law, there would have to be some sort of reunification plan. (All of that is what I asked for, by the way.) There were other options but super refused to consider them. I said a long time ago they are making rash decisions without even reading difficult child's file.</p><p></p><p>Sorry for being redundant- I'm still mulling it all over in my head and rambling about it, I guess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="klmno, post: 506722, member: 3699"] thank you, DDD. I think the problem is that PO/super put all their eggs in one basket thinking they had legal authority to instead of continuing to hash out an agreement parole plan for difficult child with me. I know that it wasn't an easy task- for them as well as me, and several things were discussed and many concerns of different types expressed from all of us thru this course. That's not the same thing as refusal- the only thing I refused was 6-8 mos ago when the plan was for difficult child to come home with no services at all, except 30 days house arrest. Obviously, I really can't make them order services though. We did go back and forth over what types of services and that's what PO and I were coming to terms with when super stepped in and refused anything but this post-d. It is their responsibility to transport a kid if a kid is being transferred like this and the central office agreed, the same as if difficult child was transported back to detention center for a court hearing or something. I'm not taking responsibility if he runs or something. The idea for me to transport him was a means to try to get me to sign the agreement for placement. It was only after central office told PO that csu had to transport difficult child that PO came forward with this app/agreement and told me that I had to sign this first if he was transporting difficult child. Otherwise, I wouldn't have known what the program really is, for certain, or that it required my consent unless I showed up with difficult child and demanded to read the entire thing prior to signing something. The fact that I didn't agree to transport difficult child is why this able able to come out prior to difficult child's release so he can't get into trouble over this mess- he hasn't been released on parole today. If PO knew that I wasn't in agreement with post-d so then it would take an order by a judge, he has had mos to get that order, or try to. The super at the Department of Juvenile Justice facility agreed with that yesterday- why did he sit here for months and not have this taken care of? This shows you how much they looked into any of it before digging their heals in. And Why on earth central office hasn't already told him to either go get a court order this week or develop a different parole plan is beyond me. He could have gotton a hearing this week to tell a judge everything you brought out and it might justify a placement out of the home, however, it still wouldn't justify a post-d placement because that would be double jeopardy. And by law, there would have to be some sort of reunification plan. (All of that is what I asked for, by the way.) There were other options but super refused to consider them. I said a long time ago they are making rash decisions without even reading difficult child's file. Sorry for being redundant- I'm still mulling it all over in my head and rambling about it, I guess. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Parent Support Forums
General Parenting
Update on PO mess!
Top