Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donna723" data-source="post: 443676" data-attributes="member: 1883"><p>I haven't heard it all but it sounds like a lot of them were thinking that they couldn't find her guilty because they didn't know the <u>exact</u> cause of death! That makes no sense to me! If that were true, they would never find anyone guilty of a murder if they couldn't pin down an exact cause of death! It would seem that all you'd need to know is that the person is dead and that the medical examiner has ruled it a homicide! I really thought that the medical examiner's ruling means that they have determined it to be NOT an accidental death? How many times in a murder case do they end up finding out exactly what happened? Only two people know that - the murderer and the victim! I think these jurors were ill-informed once they got in there and then they rushed through it. And now a woman who killed her little two year old daughter is going to be walk out of that courthouse tomorrow, free as a bird!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donna723, post: 443676, member: 1883"] I haven't heard it all but it sounds like a lot of them were thinking that they couldn't find her guilty because they didn't know the [U]exact[/U] cause of death! That makes no sense to me! If that were true, they would never find anyone guilty of a murder if they couldn't pin down an exact cause of death! It would seem that all you'd need to know is that the person is dead and that the medical examiner has ruled it a homicide! I really thought that the medical examiner's ruling means that they have determined it to be NOT an accidental death? How many times in a murder case do they end up finding out exactly what happened? Only two people know that - the murderer and the victim! I think these jurors were ill-informed once they got in there and then they rushed through it. And now a woman who killed her little two year old daughter is going to be walk out of that courthouse tomorrow, free as a bird! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
UPDATED:::CATA Group- New thread!
Top