We rang the police this morning. Having heard nothing for 36 hours, apart from the doctor's receptionist who apologised profusely to me on behalf of her (six year old) son, we've heard absolutely nothing. Certainly no hint of an apology from any kid.
So, I called the police. "I'm new at this, what is the protocol? What should we be doing?"
The officer on duty said, "According to this, you said you didn't want to take legal action."
I replied, "I said I want this to stop. I was also told that as the offenders are only 10 or less, they can't really be charged with anything."
He told me that all the children responsible had been visited by the police that night and they all seemed genuinely very sorry that difficult child 3 had been hurt, but that "difficult child 3 started it". News to me.
At first I think this officer was dismissive, but as we talked I explained a number of things:
1) we have a history of difficult child 3 getting wounded and when we try to take action we're told "he started it". Even when we have witnesses to the contrary!
2) difficult child 3 is autistic. He is extremely law-abiding. He has been drilled to NEVER even hit back, let alone begin an unprovoked attack. We have personally witnessed difficult child 3's response to being bullied and only when extremely provoked over a long period of time, does he begin to lay into the other kid(s). Generally we take him home before he gets to the hitting back stage, and praise him for keeping his cool. So to say "he started it" when the other kids are younger and smaller - doesn't wash. But the police seemed prepared to accept this - I'm not happy.
3) I pointed out that there are now parents out there who feel their child has been unfairly singled out for police attention, because my son started something and then got injured. I said this is an erroneous view (because NOTHING justifies the injury anyway) and also devalues any punishment or any chance I have of changing the attitudes of these kids. The problems will now continue with the same excuse ("he started it") because such an excuse clearly has worked for them before.
4) I want the chance to sit down with these parents (at least; their kids too if possible) and explain that Rob is not to be hassled. He is less capable of handling bullying and this sort of group behaviour shouldn't be happening. I also explained to the cop about the accidental phone call - difficult child 3 bumped the "last call" button on his phone and I could hear what was happening. The other kids were not sounding angry, they were sounding happy and excited. difficult child 3 sounded calm, with only an occasional word such as, "no", and "okay". This did not sound like difficult child 3 starting anything.
The cop was by now sounding a lot more supportive and said he would get the constable who dealt with the matter to call me this evening. He said he himself would make sure he talked to this constable at handover.
husband & I then talked to difficult child 3. I was by now concerned because difficult child 3 HAS been asking me questions like, "If someone calls me four-eyes, it is appropriate for me to reply with, 'Can't you count?'"
I keep reinforcing, "If someone is insulting you, do not let them see it upset you. Instead, do not signify it with a response but just walk away, maybe smiling and shaking your head at their stupidity."
I was now concerned that difficult child 3 may have deliberately gone looking for these kids to practice his 'anti-bullying techniques' on them.
So we questioned him. Carefully - it's so easy to re-write a different 'truth' if you don't ask the questions the correct way. I did ask, "Did you actually go looking for these kids, so you could practice your ability to verbally respond to their calling you names?"
He said, "No, I do go looking to see where they are, so I can make sure I'm not where they are."
We then talked about how being "in their territory", even if it's just to determine the safe distance, is dangerous. Mind you, they're not entitled to a territory but since they're taking one, he has to learn to stay well away and not even check to see where they are. I gave him the analogy of a boy needing to walk through the jungle from one village to another - halfway along the path is a big white tree which marks the territory of a man-eating tiger. A sensible boy will find a different way to the other village, well away from that big white tree. because the tiger is hungry, it's only doing what tigers do. You can't reason with it.
Then we got down to facts. "Tell me what happened."
he couldn't tell us the detail we needed, so I took a risk. "The police say that the other boys said you started it. Is there any way in which you might have started it?"
difficult child 3 looked exasperated and annoyed. "All I said was, 'Go away'."
"When did you say that? Did you walk up to them and say it?"
No. I had been looking to see where they were, but they weren't there. Then I was in the park and they were just coming in, they said something I can't remember, it might have been 'There he is,' and I said, "Go away, I want to be on my own.'"
Now I know that difficult child 3 can't invent something as complex as that. Nor would he - he was happy to admit his part in throwing things back once it started. he was also happy to give them credit for stopping when they drew blood, so he's not into making them look bad and him look good.
And even if he were - NOTHING justifies a gang of kids attacking another kid.
I remember that accidental phone call - those kids were not attacking out of revenge. There was no anger in their voices, just excitement./ And difficult child 3's voice betrayed no anger or sign he's been pushed to his limits. He sounded calm as if trying to calm an angry dog. And that was a full half hour before he came home - and it was right on the time when difficult child 3 SHOULD have brought himself home, by his usual pattern of behaviour. It was beginning to get dark and he had things he wanted to do before dark, such as feed the hens.
I've been told I can get the police youth liaison involved. I intend to. I do not want retribution, I do want a solution. If I do nothing now, difficult child 3 will continue to be more scared and more reluctant to leave the house. And the other parents will feel that my son is a danger and to be feared - how will this help?
Oh, did I mention that husband & I found the log? It's huge and knobbly, a bit of a tetrahedron in shape, like caltrops only log-sized. I'm amazed he didn't have a fractured skull, or a much worse laceration. I want those parents to see that log, to see what could have happened.
They also need to know what this has done to his emotional and social development - it has set him back. I'm not happy. Not happy at all. I was almost at the point of nailing my Wittenbergian thesis to the telegraph poles around town, along with photos of the damage, and the log. But it probably wouldn't help.
I'll keep you all posted on what happens from here. I should be hearing from that cop in another three hours at the latest.
Marg