I was browsing through this again - I've been thinking about this hard. And I noticed, about the vindictive thing, you posted, "He has this vindictive complex as well. Always wanting to get revenge, retaliate against someone. Seems like he blows something out of proportion, takes an unintended slight as a personal attack, or whatever, and plots against the perp."
Both my boys have done this. It seems in them to be born from a very keenly developed (overdeveloped?) sense of justice, which I'm told can go hand in hand with high IQ but which I've also seen go hand in hand with Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) in many forms.
As they've got older and I've been able to reason with them sternly about the head and neck (just kidding) they are getting the message that:
1) Sometimes the slight is imagined; and
2) It's not worth the trouble it will cause them, to 'get even'.
We role play some possible scenarios to outline what is going to happen in various eventualities. But basically - it's the weird kid who is going to be blamed for far more than he deserves, especially when the cops get involved.
Example: I took a phone call - there had apparently been three attempts in a few minutes before I finally had a voice on the other end. difficult child 1 was invited by a younger friend to go and play (his friends were all younger - this happens in Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD)). "Bring your Nintendo and some games," So difficult child 1 packs up his Nintendo and games and goes visiting.
difficult child 1 is met by a gang of younger boys throwing water at him and hosing him. He got angry - the Nintendo could have been damaged by the water (thankfully it wasn't). difficult child 1 first barricades himself INSIDE the friend's house, then comes out fighting, swearing and chasing after the younger boys, who all took off. The kid who'd invited him - it had been a set-up (hence the repeated hesitation when I kept answering the phone).
difficult child 1 headed off after the boys, grabbing a large walking stick (he often walked with a long pole-like stick, like a hiker). difficult child 1 ends up outside another house where these boys are sheltering. A woman calls out, "You are a big kid harassing these younger kids. Go away! I've called the police. "
difficult child 1 came home, seething. I asked him what was wrong and got his side of the story. I made him stay home, told him he should not have been carrying a large stick outside where these boys took refuge (it was someone's grandma - they told her this big boy had attacked them). I went round to visit the first boy and talk to him AND his parents (good friends of mine). The other boys had also gone back there and tried to accuse difficult child 1 of stuff I knew was not true. They also told me about difficult child 1 barricading himself inside their house - I promised to sort that out with difficult child 1 and explain that it was wrong ( I later made him come and apologise to friend's parents). By this stage, the young friend's mother had worked out that the gang had set difficult child 1 up and she sent all the friends home and grounded her son.
End result - difficult child 1 learned a hard, unpleasant lesson about having to accept injustice and NOT hit or even look like he was going to hit. The police never did turn up. But the young friend - he had made a choice that day to hang around with the gang and no longer be friends with difficult child 1. They had forced him to set difficult child 1 up to prove his loyalty to them. So now, difficult child 1 has the clean record, and after other incidents over the next six years where these boys have got the young friend into trouble, HE has a police record. Interestingly, he now also has an Aspie diagnosis.
Sorry for the long anecdote, but because it follows a long sequence and further events, it's been our best example.
difficult child 3 learned to hit first and ask questions later, because kids at the local school would shove, push and hit without provocation. Since THEY all did it, this must be the way to behave, he clearly thought. It's been very hard for him to unlearn this.
When we've had incidents where things have gone wrong, we explain to difficult child 3 how they could have been better handled. We don't do this in an "I told you so" way, just matter-of-fact. And when things go right, same thing. We congratulate him on getting it right, explaining how bad it could have been.
About 18 months ago difficult child 1 was in a local football game each week. Kids were dropped off by parents who failed to properly supervise their kids. As a result, some of these kids would play near a spoil heap and throw rocks at each other, at cars and at passers-by. difficult child 3 wandered over to play with these kids but I called him back. As he walked back a kid threw a rock at him.
The following week I complained about the unsupervised kids at the spoil heap. People's cars were being damaged. Then a parent said belligerently, "My son told me that difficult child 3 was the main rock-thrower." My only defence (thankfully) was that I could account for difficult child 3's movements the whole time. But accusations like this are made, with the weird kids. So after that whenever difficult child 3 wanted to go somewhere on his own, I made sure I was keeping him in sight, so I could continue to say that I could account for his movements. It wasn't fair, but he accepted my explanation - other kids were lying about him and we needed to be always able to prove them wrong. He wasn't happy, and it's ironic that we only need to do this in our home village, but as he's getting older and seeing these same liars 'going to the bad' like difficult child 1's old friend, difficult child 3 can see the long-term justice.
My final point - if you have doubts about a diagnosis, trust your instincts. I first raised the question, "Is it possible that difficult child 1 has some form of high-functioning autism?" when he was 6. difficult child 1's psychologist at the time said, "Definitely not."
When difficult child 1 was diagnosed as Asperger's (which I'd never heard of) at the age of 15, I rang and spoke to his earlier psychologist and discussed it with him. "I still disagree," he said.
The trouble is, that psychologist had only seen difficult child 1 in a one-to-one setting primarily for the purpose of psychometric assessment. They got on well together, difficult child 1 was fairly cooperative and because it did NOT involve other people the psychologist never saw the problems I was reporting. A lot of the educational problems became much more apparent as he got older.
Diagnoses in this area are subjective. There ARE criteria but how they're interpreted will vary. We've had two psychologists (including that one) assess easy child 2/difficult child 2 and were told "no Asperger's." However, increasingly there are unexplained symptoms which have no other explanation. Her paediatrician insists she's not Aspie because she can make good eye contact. Her response is, "I make good eye contact with him, because I know him. But I know I don't with other people, I have to work at it." But an Aspie label now would really make little difference to her.
With my kids, a lot of the behaviours listed in SRL's list above would be "resolved" by now. In easy child 2/difficult child 2's case they would have been very mild, only subtle. An especially bright kid quickly picks up when people find their behaviour unusual, and masks or adapts. It's much harder to get an accurate diagnosis when the kid is exceptionally bright. After working with other autistic kids over the summer holidays, I can now see just how autistic difficult child 3 really is. But he works hard to hide it most of the time. He just didn't try so hard when he knew that everyone else was autistic too.
What matters from here is - why do you need a label? If you MUST have a label that fits (for school and to get appropriate support), keep challenging the diagnosis and asking questions. But if not, then treat the problems you see. Do what works. Trust yourself and your instincts and love your child as he is. Work with him as he is. Identify and work with him in his difficult areas and praise him in his skills. Then go on from there as you make progress.
Marg