Interesting post, A dad.
I lived in a Latin American country for awhile. Actually a few of them. In one country I lived with a family in a traditional setting.
The mother lived with the family. And old lady. And there was an adult son, probably early 50's at the time, who was a drunk and would soon die. He would lay around with his back against the exterior wall of the house, with his bottle in hand. That was his life. Jesus was his name. Pronounced Hay-sus.
It is very common in most of Latin America for adult children, unmarried in particular to stay with parents, to live with them, and to rely on them, even as the parents become infirm.
I guess that is why M, my SO, is so ambivalent about my adult son. Four years ago he was a prime mover in my thinking that my son would, could only mature, if he left, and became responsible to support himself and to suffer the consequences of his choices. Now four years later, it did not work. My son got SSI. And even still does not want to pay rent. He prefers homelessness and dependency to self-sufficiency.
M now feels that he was in error. That he should never have allowed me to eject my son out of the household. He believes he defaulted in authority and in responsibility to not try to motivate and to shape my son to be a responsible adult. He believes that the responsibility of a parent never ends. Is your society like this?
I do find strange a little on this forum how important independence from you the parents for the children is.
This is a very fascinating observation.
M spent his children's childhoods instructing them in self-sufficiency and productivity. So the result was that he raised self-sufficient and productive children.
Here in the US it is different: Both parents work. In my case I was a single-parent. Much of the responsibility of raising children is handed over to the schools. My son after school went to after school programs. We were separated maybe 11 hours a day. I came home exhausted. I had no extended family.
While my son did have chores, the work of molding a productive and hard-working and self-governing adult child, I did not do.
Yes. Independence is a virtue here. Where young people establish their own nuclear families or solitary households. This I think was encouraged by the society, rather than the family, initially. The USA wants its immigrant families to live as do we. In nuclear families. I think ultimately it has to do with consumerism and with a flexible and mobile workforce. After all, if an extended family is divided into 8 households, how much more is consumed. And if an extended family puts primacy on the family unit and the home, that obstructs the mobility of the workforce.
While some immigrant groups hang on to their own cultures as best they can, in the case of my own, the family was broken up in 2 generations. That is all it took. By the time I was 17 I had left home. Pretty much never to return.
I had begun life living in an extended family. My grandmother and grandfather were the center of it. Our heart. It took only my childhood to blast the family apart.
I am thinking about a conversation I had this week with M. He talked about how peculiar it was that Americans move so much and sell their houses, rather than repair them or increase their size. He said that was completely contrary to what a Latino does. I said, well Americans are always dreaming of that bigger, better house (that confers to him (and others) his value, his worth. And the American is always chasing the better job too. So the house is expendable. The American gets rid of the house, and maybe the wife and family too. To get better. To be better.
M was appalled. He said: The Latino believes the family and the house is the center, the heart of his life. He will lose everything before he loses that. He will commute 4 hours a day to his job, rather than leave his home. He will get a simple room in a far away place to return to his original home, and family.
So to answer your question. We here in the states, I think, many of us, me, could not invest in our children to the necessary degree to build real autonomy, self-regulation and independence, which has nothing to do with living independently and responsibly.
Perhaps I am blaming myself too much. Some would say I adopted a child who already had had significant challenges. That it is from this that his lack of self-sufficiency can be traced, not to my own failures or faults.
Maybe so. But my son was also raised in a society where I had to work, and whether because of personal deficiencies or my own situation, I did not provide the necessary structure, consequences, training that could have, would have produced a productive child. Much of that may be the way it is here. In the USA. Perhaps only the winner kids are able to thrive. The more vulnerable kids, no.
M has 3 sisters here. Each of them has only girls. One sister, 5 girls. Another sister, 2 and another sister 2. All of these girl children are now young adults, the oldest is 35. Not one of those 9 girls ever established a household apart from her parents or a man. Not one. And if a relationship breaks up, there is the expectation that she return home to her parents home. Not just for protection and support. But to help the parents economically, to pool incomes. Even if it is just welfare. So here, too, we have the more traditional norm among peoples who have still resisted the governing norms.
Interesting post, yours, A dad.
Thank you.
COPA