Thank you all.
The psychiatric called back. (He is a child psychologist.) He was at the airport, so I really appreciated the fact that he called me between flights.
I tired to keep it short, but when I got to the part where I said that the neighbor came home unexpectedly and found Chris in her closet, he said, "Wow."
Several points: This is extremely dangerous because people carry guns in their homes. But difficult child has been choosing "benign" neighbors so far, the psychiatric pointed out, so that's helpful.
He doesn't know if the sexuality is driving the dangerous boundary crossing issue or vice versa or something else altogehter. That's what we have to find out. He knows a prof who deals in kids with-sexual issues so he's going to consult with-him. (I'm not sure if he's still in practice and since our dr was at the airport I didn't press the issue--we just brainstormed.)
In the meantime, we're mostly going to deal with-the trust, boundary, and freedom issues, especially since we just finished up a session where difficult child begged us for more freedom to run around the neighborhood.
The dr said he's going to mull it over and give me a call back. And of course, our next appointment. will be about boundary issues and lying. I'm wonderng if I should call the ofc and book a dbl appointment. IOW, instead of 45 min., book 1-1/2 hrs. I suspect difficult child will have a meltdown and I hate to leave in the middle of it.
The psychiatric said difficult child really pulled the wool over our eyes, insisting that he was old enough to roam the neighborhood by himself, and is going to have to earn back his freedom.
I told the dr that I am making difficult child my shadow, and he either stays home with-me or runs errands with-me. He said that was an excellent idea, and suggested "The 10-ft Rule." You can't be farther than 10 ft way from a parent.
husband thinks we should use a carrot approach, and if difficult child is good tomorrow, they could watch wrestling. That's their Fri night thing.
What does "Good" constitute? If he's with-me all day, he's not going to be taking anyone else's stuff!
difficult child thinks his consequence should be no TV--not even wrestling--or computer for 4 wks.
Hmm. Interesting. I like the idea of grounding him from those, but I think it should only be a wk. I think it would impact him more to lose his freedom to go to his friend's houses unsupervised. He hates being treated like a little kid but he has certainly not acted like a mature adult--or teen--lately.
One advantage to being off TV and computer games for a wk is that they wiill allow him to finish his assigned summer reading. (Except that he's only been reading since yesterday and is almost finished with-all 3 books so I'll have to come up with-more books). Now, if he develops an obsession for reading, that is fine by me!
easy child and I went through the pile of panties (probably $75 worth) and she is such a clothes horse, she picked out which Victoria's Secret items were winter purchases, which were summer 07 or summer 08, etc. Some were from the Gap. She also pointed out that there were a variety of sizes--the small and xs were younger patterns, polka dots and some monkey character--and the larger sizes were wider bands and very lacy. And the in-between sizes were thongs.
I am really hoping they came from camp ... not that I want to think about difficult child going through the girls' duffle bags, or even the counselors', but selfishly, I won't have to deal with-returning them.
Yes, it is partially a sensory issue. But I had written about this a few wks ago, and everyone suggested I buy difficult child his own set. So I did. He never used them. He seems to like the fact that someone else has worn them.
I like Scarlet O'Hara's thinking: "Tomorrow I'll think about it. Tomorrow is another day."