I do understand your concerns but we've got this. I am humble and would certainly ask for advice if I felt we needed it.
I thought awhile about responding. What held me back, was, RN seems to be making clear she is not seeking input about her son's drinking.
After all, I couldn't leave it alone because to me these threads after we post become a public conversation. We often get a little more than we bargained for, or believe we need when we post and create a thread.
That has been true for me since I arrived on this forum. I have insisted in staying involved with my son, and posters have expressed that I stayed in the mix too long, and too much. It stings when I get questioned. Or if there is sarcasm. Or the sense that others can see the truth of things, a truth that I can't see.
It's very hard to stay in the mix. But as you say, RN, sometimes we believe in our guts it is the right thing to do. It's difficult to stay open to the growing edge of our children, especially when our kids are backsliding or not sailing full steam ahead. It's also very hard when we want to be open to permitting our kids their learning, their autonomy, their humanity...their ability to negotiate and to make mistakes, while we continue to offer support and shelter. This takes a special kind of courage on this board, to open to that. Like this:
His recovery is in his hands to manage and he has to decide what he needs to do to keep himself on track.
Ultimately I am posting because I believe that once we post a thread it ceases to be ours alone. It belongs as much to the forum and to everybody, members or not. And this is the viewpoint that won out for me. That we can have a dialog here on this and every other thread, and that everybody can benefit from that, agree or not. Because the lives of all of our kids are at stake, and ours too.
no one knows my son like I do
What I am saying is that these threads become about all of our sons and daughters. There is a legitimate conversation in our society about addiction and how to respond to and treat it. At one end of the spectrum is the abstinence model espoused by 12 step groups, and assumptions about hitting bottom; at the other end, Harm Reduction, the position that we can and should support and stay connected to our substance abusing family members, and this will contribute to their being safe, and ultimately reduce consumption or stop it, and is more likely to enable them to function and to develop.
Implicit in your decisions, RN, seems to be this perspective.
I think the harm reduction perspective might espouse this:
Everyone is different and every family is different. Every situation is different.
AA and NA might come from the perspective that an addict is an addict, that every addict is alike, and that there is no safe substance abuse for an addict. This perspective is more commonly held in psychology, too, I think.
I am not writing all of this to educate anybody here on this board and anyway I don't know much about either perspective. But I wanted there to be on this thread some narrative about the context here, so that people who come along will understand that there are options on how to respond as a family member. And that they will be supported here on this board however they choose to respond.