I don't think she's to be pitied. Whatever the truth is, she was up to it in her eyeballs at the MINIMUM that she hid the body of her own child, concealed the death entirely for so long, allowed searches for her child, lied to police etc. And thats the MINIMUM. HOWEVER, to me, the jury spoke based on evidence as opposed to gut instinct and based on the law. And for me, someone who is a stickler for the law being followed in our justice systems, that means I do believe she is entitled to walk out of their based on convictions for misdemeanors only that she will likely get time served for or at most very little further time. Was justice done? I don't think so, even IF it was how the defense described it. But thats moral justice in my mind, not justice of a court of law. I think the prosecution should have included other charges, including wrongful disposal of a body etc. Because in this situation, where she was found non guilty based on reasonable doubt/poor evidence, their hands were tied in the jury room. They would have had no problem convicting her on charges regarding the body disposal etc and she could be in prison longer based on that, although I don't know FL law or how long she might have gotten for that.
In the end, I hate to think of anyone ever getting away with such a crime as this if she indeed murdered her daughter as opposed to a drowning. At the same time, I feel the system is made up with protections to ensure innocent people aren't found guilty on public outrage as opposed to actual evidence. Sometimes that means people who commit crimes do not face conviction, and as human beings it will never sit right with the public if the circumstantial evidence leads people to assume guilt, even if the public got it right. But when evidence isn't there, it isn't there.
I can say I wish media would go back to the time when opinions weren't injected into everything, where people didn't trump themselves up for self publicity by pretending to be experts on issues we are all only armchair spectators in. Even innocent people nowadays have no chance in the court of public opinion when supposed journalists spout speculation as fact etc. (I'm not saying they are even wrong in their GUTS, but in FACTS? There is no doubt to me anyhow that the evidence was lacking from a forensic standpoint).
I've had reason in my own life to really have to think of the justice system and its good points and not so good points. The case of my fathers abuses for over 40 years now against young women that should put him in prison for the rest of his days may indeed go in HIS favor in spite of the long list of victims and as one myself, I know the truth, heck he confessed to it in writing. Yet there is no "evidence", it will be PURELY circumstantial and i've had to truly think about how I'll feel if he walks based on lack of evidence in spite of the case building against him and his confession (which surely a good lawyer can have thrown out in court). I've come to realize that justice is what it is in a court of law. And even if he walks, I can't say the justice system failed because in the end, if I was falsely accused i'd surely want a system that ensured public opinion didn't find my guilty in spite of ineffectual evidence.
Emotionally this CA case is a gut churner for very good reasons. I get why people are outraged and they want justice in the form of public opinion being they believe she's done horrible things. Yet as someone who refused to watch the media hype and the rumors or the rag mags or whatever, I couldn't have found her guilty on the EVIDENCE. And I guess that means to me I don't have a problem with her walking free. I DO hope she gets serious psychiatric help which unfortnately a court can't order her to do. I don't think she'll be some serial murderer or danger to society. I do think it would have been "Just" for her to serve time and probably a LONG time. But I can't find myself getting upset as I'm watching people on tv today, over her being released. The justice system did its job.
I don't blame the jurors for not speaking to the media. And I do tend to believe that they probably all will be shocked at what things the public was privy to that they were not allowed to know and probably they all aren't happy with the verdict but felt they had no choice. I hope the public leaves them alone.
I also hope the Anthony family and Casey stay out of each others lives. I will say, as the only thing that I know I disagree with many here about, I find him to come across as a snake in the grass and I think he's in this up to his eye balls too. I don't see what has so many others feeling for him about or having sympathy for him. I see a family in its entirety that was dysfunctional and I do believe that we will never know what that home was like to be raised in. But loving a grandchild doesn't negate the fact that someone could be a monster in other ways. I felt this way long before she ever accused him of abuses. I don't pity Casey, but nor do I pity either of her parents. I pity Caylee, and that's the extent that I can feel emotion about that family.
All in all, I respect the jurors did the right thing based on law and just hope that people are all left alone to live their lives.