I don't think this prosecution "lost" this jury like those in the OJ case.
Whatever happened to Vasco (aka the felon, for lack of better term) that was supposed to be a huge witness for the defense? Did the defense really put him on their witness list before verifying that he didn't know a single thing about George or did he ever testify? I know he got an attny and planned to talk with the attnys on the case but then he fell off my radar.
The defense wasn't allowed to get some things in (either due to the judge not allowing it with good reason or because the witnesses didn't say what Baez assumed they would) so that really blew the little hope they had. For instance, right after having that grief counselor on, he called Cindy, Gearge and Lee back. I think he thought their stories would conflict with each other and that would help build a seed of doubt in the jurors' minds that the family was so dysfunctional, this led to different behavior with grief in Casey. None of that worked, this time all the family's testimony so closely matched eaach other that the only inconcistency seemed like normal memery lapses. George couldn't remember for sure, Cindy did remember, Lee said almost the same as Cindy but his memory was better on one area while Cindy's was better in another on this topic. Also, I think this was the topic of pets dieing and how the family buried them. Baez thought all of them had been wrapped in duct tape. Cindy and Lee both said they thought most, if not all, that the family prepared themselves were wrapped in clear packing tape, with the exception of Lee saying one he buried for his grandmother being wrapped in duct tape. (I think I got all that accurate.) It didn't go as Baez planned but even if it had, I doubt it would have been enough to convince the jury. As others pointed out, duct tape is just too common of a household product and plus, the point came out that the parents learned to prepare a pet's body that way by the vet preparing them that way with the first two, which were euthanized.
If this jury finds her guilty, I tend to think they can only find reassurance in their vote once tthey are allowed to review media coverage and hear about some things the prosecution couldn't bring out in court.
I just can't get over the fact that the defense had absolutely nothing to even insinuate the probability of sex abuse by George. Surely they must have thought they had something but it went awry- maybe they initially planned to put Casey on. I bet she doesn't use the same defense team on the appeal.