Nancy, I'm interesting in your and your husband's opinion on what could have lead to that request, after reading the link to the order for the competency evaluation that DJ posted. What sorts of things could Casey have done or said that could lead to that? Could it be as simple as her wanting to take the stand and her defense strongly suggesting that she doesn't?
I agree, Donna.
DJ, I would never doubt that Casey meets our definition of a person with mental illness. But meeting that legal definition...well, you know how that goes. I was told when difficult child was going theu his trial period that it isn't even so much that the people in the courtroom don't think he has "issues"" that caused him to do what he did, it's that they think they have no better way to address it and keep the "community safe from him". That's from a prosecution's standpoint, he was never deemed a danger to society. But again, that's where you find that huge gap between the judicial system and mental health issues and it will probabl;y always be that way because people put money into politicians who make the laws and the people with that money usually don't get it or don't care.