This is my third try to respond to this post. I included some quotes from the post just before, too.
First I want to say something important, all the while afraid that if I linger, I will lose this response as well.
My thinking and my control over my sister as I hold her within me has changed substantially. About 10 days ago I looked at her house for the last time. While I wanted to look again, I caught myself. Don't cheat. I did not have the urge to look again.
The remarkable thing is this: Her image within me has changed and settled within me. She is no longer herself as she has been these last 25 years: The Matriarch. The Professional. The Woman in Control of All. I recoil and become afraid as I type this and I am racing and cannot wait to be done. I need a new paragraph to make distance so that I can get in touch with the less scary internalized sister that she has become.
For at least the last 9 days, my sister when I think of her has settled into herself as a child. Much more manageable to deal with, for me. I think of her way less. She stays in her place. She does not threaten me. I am careful to stay away from her so as to not get pinched or tattled upon.
I am amazed by this as I reflect upon it and am wondering how and why she receded. What was it that tamed her? Was it an insight or an interpretation or could it be "don't cheat"?
Is it that I decided to no longer permit myself to give myself away to her? To not give her a power that was mine? That each time I looked at her stupid house I diminished my power and siphoned it out of me into her? I mean, I know that she did not receive my power. But I gave it to her from me. That is what is important. That I stopped it.
I am even able to reflect upon her, if I do not think, as a benign child, and leave it there. In the past. As having nothing in the world to do with me now.
As I see it now, I did marvelously well as a mom at home ~ beautifully! But when the feedback was no longer bright, healthy children learning and growing well, I collapsed into FOO reality. Because, knives at the ready, they were waiting to pounce, those old belief systems.
Yes, I know.
You can save her now, Copa; but you have to not give up on her. The intensity of the feelings now is an echo. How, in all the hells that ever were, did that little girl who was you survive it when she knew nothing about the world, or that she would escape the mother one day?
This is beautiful. Beautiful but chilling. How sad for us.
Oh, I am remembering now to tell you about the Johnny Cash song about the flood. I found on Youtube a TV interview from 1955 or so. Very old. He was so young and raw. But confident, poised.
I listened to the Johnny Cash song about the flood and pictured you and D H together. What an acknowledgment of a relationship and choosing each other and honoring what you have together in spite of what is being lost and destroyed apart from the two of you. There is a choice in that song to own as important each other, to let go what is beyond control. And at each foot of encroaching flood water they reaffirm it, they reaffirm each other, together. There is never a sense of renunciation as unimportant that which goes under. Only a joyous affirmation of the two together.
M does not understand why I am at the computer all day and night. Last night he brought in the sheets that I had washed and he dropped them on the bed next to me. An hour later he came back. The bed was still unmade. Quickly I jumped up and we made the bed together and laid down.
When I put my hand on his shoulder he said something like this: I was tired. I brought the sheets in hoping you would make the bed, so I could lie down. You are at the computer night and day.
Me: Is that a huge crime?
M: Night and day and day and night. The computer.
I kept quiet. I do not know how to explain in a way that he understands. There really are no words. I hate this about M, when he gives me a test, and a fail. I hate pop quizzes and I resent my life being set up as a stupid quiz to pass or fail. He could have helped me make the bed right from the start. He chose it. Not me.
These changes in her seem to have occurred either after her marriage or after my father died...after her last marriage,
This is what I think about your sister, Cedar. With her last marriage it seems that she acquired the means to be secure and to feel secure. I am talking about money here. There was always the desire in her to feel she had more than the rest of you. To feel and be more powerful. Because of her relatively poorer circumstances, until the last marriage she had to express that desire furtively and covertly.
Many years ago I read a book called The Powers of the Weak. It laid out the powers that oppressed peoples used against their oppressors. Your sister used those covert powers as long as she lacked the means to dominate.
My conclusion is that there is something the matter with my sister. She hates me like a green eyed snake. If I were dead, she would do everything in her power to destroy my memory or change my story. She is behaving as though I am dead, now.
While I do see her as a snake, I see this somewhat differently. I think your sister has a strong need, as does my sister, and M's evil sister, to dominate and control. I think she always did. But she could not impose her will before. She felt at a disadvantage. Now she does not.
M's sister Mercedes believes their evil sister always wanted to have more, to be more, to be above her siblings and that is why she stole the house from the parents and siblings, and took control of the household to banish the sister who had been helping her parents. She banished that sister as an Empress would banish a servant. She plotted and manipulated and pressured her family to achieve her will. Because she believed she was entitled to do this by her specialness, by her title as special (think entitled) which she bestows on herself.
This is your sister. This is my sister. They believe they deserve more. It lies covert and buried within them until life events give them their moment to reveal their true selves. And they do. Your sister did.
It was supposed to be that each of the "sisters" would be loyal to one another in a business and in a personal sense
This nauseates me. Read this again Cedar. Loyal to one another in a business and personal sense. This is pure use. Pure instrumental use. For what I can get. I scratch your back. You scratch mine. Primitive use.
It echoes the fundamentalist Christian concept of no divorce in the marriage she entered into the last time
She would never have entered a marriage for life with a poor man, would she hav? She wants and lifetime guarantee. No returns allowed.
It cannot be just my parents' house. Surely my sister could buy her own house. It is almost as though she wants to be king. That is the feel of it, in every way. And if we haven't noticed that she is king now, then she does and says the strangest things. That part, I absolutely believe. The part about wanting to be king, I mean.
Yes is exactly it. Your sister always wanted to be King. To be worshiped. Adored. With absolute powers. For life. She wants her children to inherit her powers and her domain. She set about to do it. And she did. All the rest of it, is a ruse.
My sister and my mother both seem to have developed a thing about intelligence. Who is "smart". My sister is forever harping about my mother being so "smart". (As an aside: My sister has never been known for her "smarts". I don't know how that fits in here, but I am sure that it does.)
This sickens me too, because my family had a version of this. My Aunt Rose my mother's sister became very, very wealthy. Many, many millions of dollars. In a way she had a personality like our sisters but she had the power in the world to claim it. She could be not just King but Kingmaker. She gained the power to buy powerful people if she wanted through her money. It always bothered my mother that she did not help her. My mother died with well over a million dollars of her own. But she still coveted a piece of her sister's money.
Back to "smart." To my Aunt and my mother, who cared less about it, of the grandchildren I was the one that was designated "smart." All the kids were smart put somehow I got the prize. How do you determine who is the smartest of a group of smart people? Who in life cares? But this aunt did.
The thing that infuriated me was this: I did become highly educated. I went to the best universities and I paid for it by working and loans. I educated myself while estranged from my family completely. '
But still my Aunt wanted to claim it. I told you, she say. I told you you were smart. As by her blessing me as smart with her wand, by her staff, she had made it so and could claim it for herself. How hateful. At least that was how it felt.
This was the same Aunt that used to tell me how grateful I should be that for my stepfather that beat me in the head and in the body to bring blood and bruises and crashed my head against walls. And that was the least of it compared to what he did to my spirit and my hope.
my mother was telling me about how her feelings for the disabled grand had changed, her rationale was that she should not have to spend time with people who were not "smart", who were not entertaining.
YUCK. Another Queen. How she looks down at the rest of us PLEBES. I am sorry Cedar. I do not know how you became who you are. I guess I am equally mystified about myself. How we can climb out of this to be real people.
I am wondering what would be the choice point? When did we choose to go our way and not theirs? Or was it chosen for us? By that I mean did we just receive enough stuff of love or care in our development, by accident, that we were not stuck in the muck as were they?
I want to mention something now that I have been wondering about. You have mentioned more than once that as a young woman you could be arrogant. The thing is, I was as a young and younger woman described as and accused of being arrogant. I am not in touch with what it was about me and my attitudes that were such.
If you want I would be curious to know more, so as to try to learn a bit of what might have been behind this, in me.
it could be the naming and creation of perennial victims (my brothers and me) to bolster the self.
In a way, that is what happened to David Peltzer. (A Child Called It)
That would mean everyone else has to be a victim, and has to be victimized and cannot be anything but victims. That would be a heady power to believe you held.
I think the key is power. In your sister I do not believe she seeks victims. That would be a different thing.
I think she does not care if there are victims. She is indifferent to the suffering she causes. It does not enter into her thinking at all. She does not see it. She did not cause it. Whatever suffering there might be is the responsibility of the victim, and proof that they deserve whatever situation they find themselves in. Because they are victims. They are inferior. They are not Queen.
It is all circular. She is queen because she is. She deserves what she has because she is Queen and by rights all is hers. Nothing ever rightfully belonged to anybody else. If they have feelings about it, that only demonstrates their inferiority. Anyway, it has nothing but nothing to do with her. To her your home in which she took pictures is already rightfully hers, whether or not she claims it. Get over it, Cedar. Get in step. She is Queen.
gathering with your fundamentalist Christian cohorts to call down a ring of thorns or fire or whatever it was would be just a great thing to do.
Do you suppose that is it?
Personally, I do not she avenges herself on you. I think she prays for you, and in that way pins you down to a mat like an insect in a frame in a collection. I think I might prefer the ring of fire.
Like that mean little girl in that show about life on the prairie with that handsome Little Joe Cartwright whose real name I can't remember but, woo!!
Nell, I think. Michael Landon. Not so cute, to me. My Adonis is Anthony Bourdain on CNN.
It was a lovely fantasy. I am happy that I did that, that I tried to see them and myself like that. You never do know. It could have come true. That it didn't doesn't mean it was wrong to believe in it.
Cedar, you needed the dinners to create yourself. It was never for them. They were mere play actors in your creation of yourself and your family. Actors that were paid scale and that you can choose not to recall. They are only as important as you make them. Or allow them to be. They can go to oblivion any moment you decide that you no longer need them.
My only sadness is that when you no longer need them you will no longer need us anymore.