(I wrote this before lil posted. We seem to have come to the same conclusion. Thank you Lil.)
No. Look. This isn't a good month to meet. Let me do what needs to be done and be miserable with my new reality.
I am back to quoting myself, well actually my son. But I have been thinking a lot about what Tired said here, in relation to my son:
As he was thinking of making the appointment with the therapist it set in that he is going to have to grow-up and be an adult.
After reading this comment by Tired I have been thinking about Peter Pan. And so here are the lyrics:
PETER PAN:
Are you ready for today's lesson?
Yes, sir!
PETER PAN:
Listen to your father. Repeat after me:
I won't grow up,
----I won't grow up
I don't want to go to school.
----I don't want to go to school
Just to learn to be a parrot,
----Just to learn to be a parrot
And recite a silly rule.
----And recite a silly rule
If growing up means
It would be beneath my dignity to climb a tree,
I'll never grow up, never grow up, never grow up
Not me!
Not I,
Not me!
Not me!
I won't grow up,
----I won't grow up
I don't want to wear a tie.
----I don't want to wear a tie
Or a serious expression
----Or a serious expression
In the middle of July.
----In the middle of July
And if it means I must prepare
To shoulder burdens with a worried air,
I'll never grow up, never grow up, never grow up
Not me,
Not I,
Not me!
So there!
Never gonna be a man,
I won't!
Like to see somebody try
And make me.
Anyone who wants to try
And make me turn into a man,
Catch me if you can.
I won't grow up.
----I wont grow up
I will never even try
----I will never even try
I will do what Peter tells me
----I will do what Peter tells me
And I'll never ask him why
----And I'll never ask him why
The meaning of the story is thought by many to be the universal conflict in all of us between growing up and assuming adult responsibilities and remaining a child. Peter never decides to grow up and enter the real world, and his relationship with Wendy after she returns home is continued by returning to take her daughter back to Neverland.
My own son is now 30 years old. Of course I have to face that for him, like with Peter, there will never be a time when he steps up to adult responsibilities, that this is him. I think more and more we are at that point. But at the same time there is a large element of dominance in his stance. That he will not accept any of our terms, no matter how basic. He will not even enter into negotiation with us. The very thought of a compromise, he will not consider. It feels to him, it seems, like he is giving up some essential part of his life and of himself, if he meets us even one quarter of the way.
I have less pain ever since I expect less from her. On occasion, I experience something akin to guilt, because I feel if I took over and almost ran her life,
Nomad is talking here about the awareness that if she took over administrating her daughter's daughter would do better.
I have been studying my faith, and I believe there is a cornerstone belief that everybody deserves their own life. That if we take over their life we deprive them of that right to live it. That they have an independent g-d given right to live the meaning of that life. That each of us has work to do, independently, and it is a wrong thing to act to take that away.
So. There is not the damage to our own spirits (and even souls) it is the damage we do to them, and that this damage is of the most profound kind. It is spiritual.
I do not think I am wrong to encourage my son to help himself, to help himself to live and to live safely and with dignity. But to the extent that my son continues to choose to live a Peter Pan life, it is clearer to me that I can do not a thing to stop him.
I was not wrong to ask for nominal rent and to insist upon it. I was not wrong to have the expectation that he find a way to be responsible for his money, even if that would be a payee. I was not wrong to insist that he find a way to maintain and keep clean the property. These are adult responsibilities that are the duties of everybody who is of sane mind. He is of sane mind.
I have found a place where I can communicate to my son, where I am offering support and concessions. I told him:
if you believe I am asking too much, tell me, and we will find something that works for you, that you feel able to do and want to do.
More and more I see what M was saying:
J has to do something. Something has to come from him. He has to want something. It can't all come from you.
This is a law of nature. NO matter how much I want it to be different, I cannot change Nature. There is always compromise in order to survive. Organisms have a habitat in which they can maintain their lives. (We have many cactus plants. In the desert cactus will achieve a certain height. At our house they grow giant. They thrive. They defy their natural limits with care, with water, with optimum conditions and they flourish.)
My son is choosing the habitat that he can maintain. He is clearly saying "no" to my encouragement and offers. He neither wants to meet me nor return here, as long as I ask anything of him. Maybe this will change as it gets colder and wetter or if something happens to make the situation uncomfortable for him.
And then he will push again coming home. He will not have done one thing to change. He will want to come when he is using, and he will want to come when he has no money, and he will want to come home as a street person. What will I do?
I think I will act out of the smithmom playbook and I will every single day make suggestions for him to do one thing to make his life better. The communications channel is open, and I will use it. Then one day, maybe, he will decide to do one thing.
The only other option for me is to say: come home. Be anybody you want to be. Do anything you want to do. Pay or not. Don't worry about your health. Just exist. Could I do that?
Yes. I could. Afraid enough I could do it. When his health begins to fail, I could do it? Should I do it now? I don't know.
I think I would feel resentful because allowing him to live like that means I would sacrifice the ability to rent out the front house to tenants. Because if he lives like a homeless person, I don't see who would want to share even a property with him. There is perhaps 50' feet between the two residences, which are separated by the depth of both of their yards, which are divided by fence. M will build a separated entry path for J so that he will not enter their yard to get to his own.
I guess it is not about specific things, specific conditions. It is about his attitude: Take me as I am. Accept me in whatever form I insist upon. This is me. I will not be 1 percent different. Accept no rent. Accept 24 hour marijuana. I am me. And accept my rules about how I impact you.
That is where I have trouble. Am I wrong?